Evaluation of Operational Risks on PT. Global Indo Pangan’s Supply Chain Using House of Risk I Method
Keywords:
HOR I, Risk Management,, SCOR, ARP, Supply ChainAbstract
One of the challenges in managing supply chain is uncertainty. Uncertainty can cause risk which can interfere supply chain activity. In managing their supply chain, PT. Global Indo Pangan meets a lot of uncertainty that can cause risk such as demand uncertainty which makes the company can only rely on forecasting that can lead to miscalculating or even uncertainty from supplier like delivery time or quality of the product. Therefore, supply chain risk management is needed. One of the approaches to manage the risk is house of risk I (HOR I) method. This method will enable company to prioritize risk agents that cause risk events to be treated. Supply Chain Operation Reference (SCOR) model is used to define supply chain activity. First steps is identify risk by doing interview with divition which is related to supply chain. Next, risk is divided into low risk, medium risk, high risk, and very high-risk using risk maps. Risk assessment is performed by calculate aggregate risk potential (ARP) in a way assess severity of risk events, occurance of risk agents, and correlation between risk event and risk agent. The result of HOR 1 shows that there are 8 risk events which is cause by 13 risk agents. 7 risk agents is chosen by pareto analysis to make preventive action against it. There are 6 action plans that can be done to prevent risk agents as the result the severity of risk events can be reduced or even be removed.
References
Chan, F. T., Qi, H., Chan, H. K., Lau, H. C., & Ip, R. W. (2003). A Conceptual Model of Performance Measurement For Supply Chains. Management Decision, 635-642.
Hanafi, M. M. (2016). Manajemen Risiko. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
Haughey, D. (2014). Pareto Analysis Step by Step. Retrieved July 11, 2017, from projectsmart.co.uk: https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/pareto-analysis-step-by-step.php
Ishikawa, D. K. (1976). Guide to Quality Control. Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization.
Johnson, P. F., & Flynn, A. E. (2015). Purchasing and Supply Management. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2011). Project Management: The Managerial Process (5th ed.). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Merna, T., & Thani, F. A. (2008). Corporate Risk Management (2nd ed.). West Sussex: John.
Mulyawan, S. (2015). Manajemen Risiko. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.
Pujawan, I. N. (2010). Supply Chain Management. Surabaya: Guna Widya.
Pujawan, I. N., & Geraldin, L. H. (2009). House of risk, a model for proactive supply chain risk management. Business Process Management Journal, 953-967.
Standard, J. A. (2004). Australian / New Zealand Standard 4360:2004, Risk Management. Wellington: Australia Internasional Ltd.
Sugiyono, P. D. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA,cv.
Tang, C. (2006). robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. international journal of logistics: reserach and application, 33-45.
Warburg, S. (2004). The Practice of Risk Management. Euromoney Book.
Water, D. (2007). Supply Chain Risk Management. London: Kogan Page Limited.
